PRACA ORYGINALNA
Width-to-length ratio of maxillary anterior teeth in the diastematic dentition
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Department of fixed prosthodontics, DDM, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Research
Laboratory of Occlusodontics and Ceramic Prostheses LR16ES15, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia, Tunisia
2
Department of fixed prosthodontics, Faculty of dental medicine, Monastir, Tunisia
Data nadesłania: 25-12-2022
Data ostatniej rewizji: 11-02-2023
Data akceptacji: 27-03-2023
Data publikacji: 27-03-2023
Autor do korespondencji
Yosra Gassara
Department of fixed prosthodontics, DDM, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Research
Laboratory of Occlusodontics and Ceramic Prostheses LR16ES15, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia, Street of genev-Skanes- Monastir, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
Prosthodontics 2023;73(1):11-17
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Background:
Diastema between maxillary anterior teeth may affect the smile, for that reason patients nowadays more and more often request a diastema closure procedure.
Aim of the study:
To investigate the differences in the width-to-length ratio of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with and without diastema.
Material and methods:
The study was conducted on Tunisian individuals (n=109) divided into two groups: the study group with diastema (n=50) and the control group without diastema (n=59). A digital vernier caliper was used to measure the length and width of maxillary anterior teeth on plaster models. The width was measured from mesial and distal contact points of the tooth on a line perpendicular to the long axis. The length measured the longest distance from the cervical margin to the incisal edge on a line parallel to the long axis. SPSS software was used to calculate the width-to-length ratio for each tooth and to analyze the data.
Results:
Statistical analysis showed that there is no significant difference of width to length ratio of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with
or without diastema (left canine: P=0.251; left
lateral incisor: P=0.916; left central incisor:
P=0.097; right central incisor: P=0.711; right
lateral incisor: P=0.879; right canine: P=0.788).
The level of significance was set at 0.05.
Conclusions:
The width-to-length ratio given
in this study may serve as guidelines for treatment
planning for the diastema closure procedure.