Centric relation in prosthetic rehabilitation

Williamson EH, Lundquist DO: Anterior guidance:it’s effect on electromyographic activityon the temporal and masseter muscles. JProsthet Dent 1983; 49: 816‐823.

Google Scholar

Report of the National Society of Denture Prosthetists. JADA 1930; 17: 1123.

Google Scholar

The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. JProsthet Dent 2005; 94: 10-92.

Google Scholar

Kostrzewa-Janicka J: Stany artykulacyjne żuchwy.W: Diagnostyka układu ruchowego narządużucia. Zasady rekonstrukcji zwarcia,pod red. Mierzwińskiej-Nastalskiej E., MedTour Press International, Otwock 2009, 36-46.

Google Scholar

Posselt U: Studies in the mobility of the humanmandible. Acta Odontol Scand 1952; 10.

Google Scholar

Hodge LC, Mahan PE Jr: A study of mandibularmovement from centric occlusion to maximumintercuspation. J Prosthet Dent 1967;18: 19-30.

Google Scholar

Davies S, Gray RMJ: What is occlusion? BrDent J 2001; 191(5): 235-245.

Google Scholar

10.

Slaviček R: The Masticatory Organ. GammaMedizinisch- wissenschaftliche FortbildungAG,Klosterneuburg 2002.

Google Scholar

11.

Ehrmann E, Greven M, Ré JF, Orthlieb JD:Interdisciplinary approach to the mandibulartherapeutic position in oral rehabilitation, JStomat Occ Med 2013; 6: 115-119.

Google Scholar

12.

Orthlieb JD, Hernandez G, Darmouni L, RéLJ, Girardeau A, Slavicek G: Myostabilizedcentric relation. A consensual articular referenceposition. J Stomat Occ Med 2011; 4: 87-94.

Google Scholar

13.

Lytle JD: Clinician’s index of occlusal disease:definition, recognition, and management.Int J Periodont Res Dent 1990; 10: 102-123.

Google Scholar

14.

Lerman, Martin D: The muscle engram: thereflex that limits conventional occlusal treatment.Cranio 2011; 29: 297-303.

Google Scholar

15.

Long JH Jr: Location of the terminal hingeaxis by intraoral means. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23: 11-24.

Google Scholar

16.

Long JH: Locating centric relation with a leafgauge. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29: 608-610.

Google Scholar

17.

Lucia VO: Technique for recording centric relation.J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14: 492-505.

Google Scholar

18.

Chandu A, Suvinen TI, Reade PC, BorromeoGL: The effect of an interocclusal applianceon bite force and masseter electromyographyin asymptomatic subjects and patients withtemporomandibular pain and dysfunction. JOral Rehabil 2004; 31: 530-537.

Google Scholar

19.

Pereira SallesPalinkas M, Hallak R, SimoneC, de Sousa LG, Siéssere S, Semprini M,Bataglion C: The effect of a Lucia jig for 30minutes on neuromuscular re-programming,in normal subjects. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26:530-535.

Google Scholar

20.

Santosa RE, Azizi M, Whittle T, WanigaratrneK, Klineberg IJ: The influence of the leafgauge and anterior jig on jaw muscle electromyographyand condylar head displacement:a pilot study. Aust Dent J 2006; 51: 33-41.

Google Scholar

21.

NTI-tss User’s Guidebook http://www.nti-tss.com/NTI-

Google Scholar

22.

Stapelmann H, Türp JC: The NTI-tss devicefor the therapy of bruxism, temporomandibulardisorders, and headache – Where do westand? A qualitative systematic review of theliterature. BMC Oral Health 2008; 29.

Google Scholar

23.

Kois JC, Phillips KM: Occlusal vertical dimension:alterations concerns. CompendContin Educ Dent 1997; 18: 1169-1180.

Google Scholar

24.

Wessberg BA, Wesley LC, Dinham R, WolfordLM: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation asan adjunt in the management of myofacialpain dysfunction syndrome. J Prothat Dent1981; 45: 307-314.

Google Scholar

25.

Williamson EH, Marshall D: Myomonitor restposition in the presence and absence of stress.Research Rep 1986; 1: 14-16.

Google Scholar

26.

Wilson PHR, Banerjee A: Recording the retrudedcontact position: a review of clinical techniques.Br Dent J 2004; 196: 395-402.

Google Scholar

27.

Helkimo M, Zarb GA, Bergman B, ClaytonJA, MacKay HF: Prosthodontic treatment ofpartially edentulous patients. Various centricpositions and methods of recording them. StLouis Mosby 1978.

Google Scholar

28.

Zarb GA, Bolarder CL, Hickey JC, CarlssonGE: Boucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients, 10th edn. The C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis 1997; 283, 270,422

Google Scholar

29.

Spiechowicz E: Protetyka Stomatologiczna.Podręcznik dla studentów, PZWLWydawnictwo, Warszawa 2013, wyd. 6.

Google Scholar

30.

Atwood DA: A cephalometric study of theclinical rest position of the mandible. Part III.Clinical factors related to variability of theclinical rest position following the removalof occlusal contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1958; 8:698-708.

Google Scholar

31.

Kleinrok M: Zaburzenia czynnościowe układuruchowego narządu żucia. Wyd Czelej,Lublin 2012, wyd.5.

Google Scholar

32.

Shanahan TE: Physiologic jaw relations andocclusion of complete dentures. J ProsthetDent 1955; 5: 319-322.

Google Scholar

33.

Abdel-Hakim AM: The swallowing positionas a centric relation record. J Prosthet Dent1982; 47: 12-15. 34 Alvarez MC: Comparative Study ofIntermaxillary Relationships of Manual andSwallowing Methods. Braz Dent J 2009: 20:78-83.

Google Scholar

34.

(12): 2343-2349.

Google Scholar

35.

Millet C, Jeannin C, Vincent B, Malquarti G:Report on the determination of occlusal verticaldimension and centric relation using swallowingin edentulous patients, J Oral Rehabil2003; 30: 1118-1122.

Google Scholar

36.

Gatozzi JG, Nicol BR, Somes GW: Variationsin mandibular rest positions with and withoutdentures in place. J Prosthe. Dent 1976; 36:159-163.

Google Scholar

37.

Kantor ME, Silverman SI, Garfinkel L: Centricrelation recording techniques – a comparativeinvestigation, J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 593-600.

Google Scholar

38.

Okoński P: Zastosowanie BiofunkcjonalnegoSystemu Protetycznego (BPS) w rehabilitacjinarządu żucia u pacjentów bezzębnych. ProtetStomatol 2002; 52: 237-249.

Google Scholar

39.

Kostrzewa-Janicka J, Mierzwińska-NastalskaE: Możliwości zastosowania determinantokluzji w praktyce klinicznej. Protet Stomatol2008; 5: 391-398.

Google Scholar

40.

Lederman K, Clayton J: Patients with restoredocclusions. Part I: TMJ dysfunction determinedby a pantographic reproducibility index.J Prosthet Dent 1982a; 47: 198.

Google Scholar

41.

Maruyama T, Miyauchi S, Umekoji E, SimoosaT: Analysis of the relationship of centric relationand centric occlusion by the MandibularKinesiograph. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1980;20: 173-178.

Google Scholar

42.

George JP, Boone ME: A clinical study ofrest position using the Kinesiograph andMyomonitor. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41, 4:456-462.

Google Scholar

43.

Wessberg GA, Epker BN, Elliott AC:Comparison of mandibular rest positions inducedby phonetics, transcutaneous electricalstimulation, and masticatory electromyography.J Prosthet Dent 1983;. 49 (1): 100-105.

Google Scholar

44.

Sperr W: Results of axiography and its effecton conservative dentistry. Quintessenz 1983;

Google Scholar

45.

McKee JR: Comparing condylar positionsachieved through bimanual manipulation tocondylar positions achieved through masticatorymuscle contraction against an anteriordeprogrammer: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent2005; 94: 389-393.

Google Scholar

46.

Dawson PE: Centric relation. Continuum(NY) 1980: 49-60.

Google Scholar

47.

Celar A, Freudenthaler J, Crismani A, GrafA: Guided and unguided mandibular referencepositions in asymptomatic individuals.Orthod Craniofac Res 2013; 16: 28-35.

Google Scholar

48.

Bell WE: Temporomandibular disorders, classification,diagnosis, management. Chicago:Year Book Medical Publishers 1986.

Google Scholar

49.

Saini V, Singla R: Biofunctional prostheticsystem: A new era complete denture. J PharmBioallied Sci 2011; 3: 170-172

Google Scholar

50.

Nekora-Azak A, Evlioglu G, Ozdemir-KarataşM, Keskin H: Use of biofunctional prostheticsystem following partial maxillary resection: a clinical report. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 693-695.

Google Scholar

51.

Fenlon MR, Sherriff M: An investigation offactors influencing patients‘ satisfaction withnew complete dentures using structural equationmodelling. J Dent 2008; 36: 427-434.

Google Scholar

52.

Fenlon MR, Sherriff M, Walter JD: Associationbetween the accuracy of intermaxillary relationsand complete denture usage. J ProsthetDent 1999; 81: 520-525.

Google Scholar

53.

Dervis E: The influence of the accuracy of theintermaxillary relations on the use of completedentures: a clinical evaluation. J OralRehabil 2004; 31: 35-41.

Google Scholar

54.

Utz KH, Muller F, Luckerath W, Fuß E, KoeckB: Accuracy of check-bite registration andcentric condylar position. J Oral Rehabil2002; 29: 458-466.

Google Scholar

55.

Warren K, Capp N: A review of principles andtechniques for making interocclusal recordsfor mounting working casts. Int J Prosthodont1990; 3: 341-348.

Google Scholar

56.

Murray MC, Smith PW, Watts DC, WilsonNFH: Occlusal registration: science or art? IntDent J 1999; 49: 41-46.

Google Scholar

57.

Dixon DL: Overview of articulation materialand methods for the prosthodontic patient. JProsthet Dent 2000; 2: 235-247.

Google Scholar

58.

Panek H: Systemy komputerowe w diagnostycezaburzeń układu stomatognatycznego.W: Nowe technologie w protetyce stomatologicznej,pod red. nauk. H. Panek. Wyd. AMWrocław 2006; 21-37

Google Scholar

Submit your paper

For Authors

eISSN:	2391-601X
ISSN:	0033-1783