Metody oczyszczania powierzchni zębiny z resztek cementów tymczasowych i wpływ ich pozostałości na jakość połączenia z cementami kompozytowymi – przegląd literatury

Piotr Knytel; Beata Dejak

doi:10.5604/.1125403

1.

Richardson D., Tao L., Pashley D.H.: Dentinpermeability: effects of crown preparation. Int. J. Prosthodont., 199, 4, 3, 219-225.

Google Scholar

2.

Goldman M., Laosonthorn P., White R.R.: Microleakage – full crowns and the dental pulp. J. Endod., 1992, 18, 10, 473-475.

Google Scholar

3.

Kim S.: Neurovascular interactions in the dental pulp in health and inflammation. J. Endod., 1990, 16, 2, 48-53.

Google Scholar

4.

Baldissara P., Comin G., Martone F., Scotti R.: Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1998, 80, 4, 417-422.

Google Scholar

5.

Rego M.R.1., Santiago L.C.: Retention of provisional crowns cemented with eight temporary cements: comparative study. J. Appl. Oral Sci., 2004, 12, 3, 209-212.

Google Scholar

6.

Ribeiro J.C.V., Silva M.M., Fernandes C.A.O.: Influence of temporary cements on the bondstrength of resinous materials to the dental substrate. RGO – Rev. Gaucha Odontol., 2012, 60, 1, 91-98.

Google Scholar

7.

Chaiyabutr Y., Kois J.C.: The Effects of Tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bondstrength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. Oper. Dent., 2008, 33, 5, 556-563.

Google Scholar

8.

Lepe X., Bales D.J., Johnson G.H.: Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from twomaterials with the use of four temporary cements. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1999, 81, 4, 469-475.

Google Scholar

9.

Majewski S.W., Pryliński M.: Materiały i technologie współczesnej protetyki stomatologicznej. Lublin 2013.

Google Scholar

10.

Markowitz K., Moynihan M., Liu M., Kim S.: Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. A clinically oriented review. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 1992, 73, 6, 729-737.

Google Scholar

11.

Gegauff A.G., Rosenstiel S.F.: Effect of provisional luting agents on provisional resin additions. Quintessence Int., 1987, 18, 12, 841-845.

Google Scholar

12.

Abo-Hamar S.E., Federlin M., Hiller K.A., Friedl K.H., Schmalz G.: Effect of temporarycements on the bondstrength of ceramic luted to dentin. Dent. Mater., 2005 Sep;21, 9, 794-803.

Google Scholar

13.

Millstein P.L., Nathanson D.: Effects of temporary cementation on permanent cement retention to composite resin cores. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1992, 67, 6, 856-859.

Google Scholar

14.

Rosentiel S.F., Gegauff A.G.: Effect of provisional cementing agents on provisional resins. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1988, 59, 1, 29-33.

Google Scholar

15.

Taira J., Ikemoto T., Yoneya T., Hagi A., Murakami A., Makino K.: Essential oil phenyl propanoids. Useful as OH scavengers?, Free Radic. Res. Commun., 1992, 16, 3, 197-204.

Google Scholar

16.

Marshall S.J., Marshall G.W. Jr, Harcourt J.K.: The influence of various cavity bases onthe micro-hardness of composites. Aust. Dent. J., 1982, 27, 5, 291-295.

Google Scholar

17.

Fonseca R.B., Marcondes Dietschi L.R., Quagliatto P.S., Soares C.J.: Influence of provisionalcements on ultimate bond strength of indirect composite restorations to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent., 2005, 7, 3, 225-223.

Google Scholar

18.

Paige H., Hirch S.M., Gelb M.N.: Effects of temporary cements on crown-to-compositeresin core bond strength. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1986, 55, 1, 49-52.

Google Scholar

19.

Civjan S., Huget E.F., de Simon L.B.: Compatibility of resin composites with varnishes, iners, and bases [abstract 27]. J. Dent. Res., 1973, 52, 65.

Google Scholar

20.

Lingard G.L., Davies E.H., Von Fraunhofe J.A.: The interaction between materials and composite resin restorative materials. J. Oral Rehabil., 1981, 8, 2, 121-129.

Google Scholar

21.

Mayer T., Pioch T., Duschner H., Staehle H.J.: Dentinal adhesion and histomorphologyof two dentinal bonding agents under the influence of eugenol. Quintessence Int., 1997, 28, 1, 57-62.

Google Scholar

22.

Terata R.: Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of a temporarycement – study on removal of temporary cement. Dent. Mater. J., 1993, 12, 1, 18-28.

Google Scholar

23.

Baier R.E.: Principles of adhesion. Oper. Dent., 1992, 5, suppl, 1-9.

Google Scholar

24.

Paul S.J., Scharer P.: Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesivebonding systems on dentine. J. Oral Rehabil., 1997, 24, 1, 8-14.

Google Scholar

25.

Jung M., Ganss C., Senger S.: Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements on bondstrength of composite to enamel. Oper. Dent., 1998, 23, 2, 63-68.

Google Scholar

26.

Woody T.L., Davis R.D.: The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporarycements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper. Dent., 1992, 17, 5, 175-180.

Google Scholar

27.

Rosales-Leal J.I., Osorio R., Toledano M., Cabrerizo-Vilchez M.A., Millstein P.L.:Influence of eugenol contamination on the wetting of ground and etched dentin. Oper. Dent., 2003, 28, 6, 695-699.

Google Scholar

28.

Peutzfeldt A., Asmussen E.: Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacyof dentin-bonding systems. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 1999, 107, 1, 65-69.

Google Scholar

29.

Peutzfeldt A., Asmussen E.: Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent., 2006, 8, 1, 31-34.

Google Scholar

30.

Xie J., Powers J.M., McGuckin R.S.: In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel anddentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent. Mater., 1993, 9, 5, 295-299.

Google Scholar

31.

Watanabe E.K., Yamashita A., Imai M., Yatani H., Suzuki K.: Temporary cement remnants asan adhesion inhibiting factor in the interface between resin cements and bovine dentin. Int. J. Prosthodont., 1997, 10, 5, 440-452.

Google Scholar

32.

Terata R., Nakashima K., Obara M., Kubota M.: Characterization of Enamel and Dentinsurfaces after removal of a temporary cement – effect of temporary cement on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement. Dent. Mater J., 1994, 13, 2, 148-154.

Google Scholar

33.

Yap A.U., Shah K.C., Loh E.T., Sim S.S., Tan C.C.: Influence of eugenol-containing temporaryrestorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper. Dent., 2001, 26, 6, 556-561.

Google Scholar

34.

Bayindir F., Akyil M.S., Bayindir Y.Z.: Effect of eugenol and noneugenol containing temporary cement on permanent cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin. Dent. Mater J., 2003, 22, 4, 592-599.

Google Scholar

35.

Holderegger C., Paul S.J., Luthy H., Scharer P.: Bond strength of one-bottle dentin bondingagents on human dentin. Am. J. Dent., 1997, 10, 2, 71-76.

Google Scholar

36.

Meyerowitz J.M., Rosen M., Cohen J., Becker P.J.: The effect of eugenol containing and non-eugenol temporary cements on the resinenamel bond. J. Dent. Assoc. S. Afr., 1994, 49, 8, 389-392.

Google Scholar

37.

Watanabe E.K., Yatani H., Ishikawa K., Suzuki K., Yamashita A.: Pilot study of conditioner/primer effects on resin – dentin bonding after provisional cement contaminationusing SEM, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and bond strength evaluation measures. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2000, 83, 3, 349-355.

Google Scholar

38.

Grasso C.A., Caluori D.M., Goldstein G.R., Hittelman E.: In vivo evaluation of three cleansingtechniques for prepared abutment teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2002, 88, 4, 437-441.

Google Scholar

39.

Ganss C., Jung M.: Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper. Dent., 1998, 23, 2, 55-62.

Google Scholar

40.

Hume W.R.: An analysis of the release and the diffusion through dentin of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures. J. Dent. Res., 1984, 63, 6, 881-884.

Google Scholar

41.

Hansen E.K., Asmussen E.: Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin--bonding agents. Scand. J. Dent. Res., Scand. J. Dent. Res., 1987, 95, 6, 516-520.

Google Scholar

42.

Terata R., Nakashima K., Kubota M.: Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth. Am. J. Dent., 2000, 13, 4, 209-211.

Google Scholar

43.

Kanakuri K., Kawamoto Y., Kakehashi Y., Matsumura H.: Influence of temporary cementson bond strength between resin-based luting agents and dentin. Am. J. Dent., 2006, 19, 2, 101-105.

Google Scholar

44.

Coli P., Alaeddin S., Wennerberg A., Karlsson S.: In vitro dentin pretreatment: surface roughness and adhesive shear bond strength. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 1999, 107, 5, 400-413.

Google Scholar

45.

Watanabe E.K., Yamashita A., Yatani H., Ishikawa K., Suzuki K.: Improvement in thetensile bond strength between resin cement and dentin surfaces after temporary cement application. Int. J. Prosthodont., 1998, 11, 3, 203-211.

Google Scholar

46.

Kanakuri K., Kawamoto Y., Matsumura H.: Influence of temporary cement remnant andsurface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. J. Oral Sci., 2005, 47, 1, 9-13.

Google Scholar

47.

Schwartz R., Davis R., Hilton T.J.: Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of resincement. Am. J. Dent., 1992, 5, 3, 147-150.

Google Scholar

48.

Myers T.D.: Advances in air abrasive technology. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 1994, 22, 9, 41-44.

Google Scholar

49.

Hume W.R.: In vitro studies on the local pharmacodynamics, pharmacology and toxicology of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. Int. Endod. J., 1988, 21, 2, 130-134.

Google Scholar

50.

Katora M.E., Jubach T., Polimus M.M.: Air abrasive etching of the enamel surface. Quintessence Int. Dent. Dig., 1981, 12, 9, 967-968.

Google Scholar

51.

Burnett L.H. Jr, Conceicao E.N., Pelinos J.E., Eduardo C.D.: Comparative study of influenceon tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er-YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg., 2001, 19, 4, 199-202.

Google Scholar

52.

Chaves P., Giannini M., Ambrosano G.M.: Influence of smear layer pretreatments on bond strength to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent., 2002, 4, 3, 191-196.

Google Scholar

53.

Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Mattar D., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P.: Microtensilebond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper. Dent., 2003, 28, 5, 647-660.

Google Scholar

54.

Carvalho C.N., Bauer J.R.O., Loguercio A.D., Reis A.: Effect of ZOE temporary restorationon resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 2007, 19, 3, 144-152.

Google Scholar

55.

Saraç D., Bulucu B., Saraç Y.S., Kulunk S.: The effect of dentin-cleaning agents on resincement bond strength to dentin. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 2008, 139, 6, 751-758.

Google Scholar

56.

Jacques P., Hebling J.: Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of aconventional and a self-etching primer adhesive system. Dent. Mater., 2005, 21, 2, 103-109.

Google Scholar

57.

Van Meerbeek B., Inokoshi S., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G.: Morphologicalaspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J. Dent. Res., 1992, 71, 8, 1530-1540.

Google Scholar

58.

Eick J.D., Gwinnett A.J., Pashley D.H. Robinson S.J.: Current concepts on adhesionto dentin. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med., 1997, 8, 3, 306-335.

Google Scholar

59.

Takimoto M., Ishii R., Iino M., Shimizu Y., Tsujimoto A., Takamizawa T., Ando S., Miyazaki M.: Influence of temporary cement contamination on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of self-adhesive cements. J. Dent., 2012, 40, 2, 131-138

Google Scholar

60.

Sanabe A.E., Giorgetti A.P.O., Cruz A.R., Hebling J.: Influência da contaminação da dentina por cimentos temporários na resistência da união de sistemas adesivos. RGO – Rev. Gaúcha Odontol., 2009, 57, 1, 33-39.

Google Scholar

61.

Macchi R.L., Capurro M.A., Herrera C.L., Cebada F.R., Kohen S.: Influence of endodonticmaterials on the bonding of composite res-in to dentin. Endod. Dent. Traumatol., 1992, 8, 1, 26-29.

Google Scholar

62.

Nikaido T., Kataumi M., Burrow M.F., Inokoshi S., Yamada T., Takatsu T.: Bond strength of resin to enamel and dentin treated with low-pressure air abrasion. Oper. Dent., 1996, 21, 5, 218-224.

Google Scholar

63.

Manhart J., Mehl A., Schroeter R., Obster B., Hickel R.: Bond strength of composite to dentin treated by air abrasion. Oper. Dent., 1999, 24, 4, 223-232.

Google Scholar

eISSN:	2391-601X
ISSN:	0033-1783