PL EN
 
PL EN
Bieżący numer
Archiwum
O czasopiśmie
Instrukcje dla autorów
6/2015 vol. 65
Wyświetlenia: 75
Pobierz cytowanie
PRACA ORYGINALNA
Analiza stabilizacji pierwotnej i wtórnej modyfikowanych wszczepów tytanowych w badaniach porównawczych Osstell Mentor i Periotest S na modelu zwierzęcym
Bartosz Leda 1
,
 
Przemysław Gajdus 1
,
 
Michał Wawrzyniak 1
,
 
Adam Piosik 1
,
 
Wiesław Hędzelek 1
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Poznań University of Medical Sciences
 
 
Prosthodontics 2015;65(6):528-539
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/.1185914
 
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
stabilizacja wszczepów
powierzchnie aktywne tytanu
Osstell Mentor
Periotest S
badania na modelu zwierzęcym
 
REFERENCJE (29)
1.
Branåemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T:Tissue-integrated prostheses. OsseointegrationIn clinical dentistry. Quintessence PublishingCo., Chicago, IL, 1985.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, SutterF: The reactions of bone, connective tissue,and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayedsurfaces. J Maxillofac Surg1981; 9, 1: 15-25.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, HigginbottomFL, Hermann JS, Makins SR, Buser D:Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implantwith a sandblasted and acid-etched surfacein the canine mandible: radiographic results.Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 240-252.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T: Effects of titaniumsurface topography on bone integration:a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res2009; 20, 4: 172-184.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington PEriksson AR: The longterm efficacy of currentlyused dental implants: a review and proposedcriteria of success. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants 1986; 1, 1: 11-25.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, BoyanBD: The role of implant surface characteristicsin the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral BiolMed 1997; 7: 329-345.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
Javed F., Romanos GE: The role of primarystability for successful immediate loading ofdental implants. A literature review. J Dent2010; 38, 8: 612-620.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Eriksson C, Lausmaa J, Nygren H: Interactionsbetween human whole blood and modifiedTiO2 surfaces: Influence of surface topographyand oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesionand activation. Biomater 2001, 22, 1987-1996.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Meredith N, Alleyne D, Crawley P:Quantitative determination of the stability ofthe implant-tissue interface using resonancefrequency analysis. Cli Oral Implants Res1996; 7: 261-267.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
Lachmann S, Jager B, Axmann D, GomezRomanG, Groten M, Weber H: Resonancefrequency analysis and damping capacity assessment.Part 1: an in vitro study on measurementreliability and a method of comparisonin the determination of primary dental implantstability. Clin Oral Impl. Res 2006; 17, 1: 75-79.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
Noguerol B, Munoz R, Mesa F, de DiosLuna H, O’Valle F: Early implant failure.Prognostic capacity of Periotest: retrospectivestudy of a large sample. Clin Oral Impl Res2006; 17, 4: 459-464.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Calasans-Maia MD, Monteiro ML, AscoliFO, Granjeiro JM: The rabbit as an animalmodel for experimental surgery. Acta Cir Bras2009; 24, 4: 325-328.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Struillou X, Boutigny H, Soueidan A,Layrolle P: Experimental Animal Modelsin Periodontology: A Review. Open Dent J2010; 29, 4: 37-47.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Gilsanz V, Roe TF, Gibbens DT, Schulz EE,Carlson ME, Gonzalez O, Boechat MI: Effectof sex steroids on peak bone density of growingrabbits. Am J Physiol 1988; 255, 4 Pt 1:416-421
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Castañeda S, Largo R, Calvo E, Rodríguez Salvanés F, Marcos ME, Díaz-Curiel M, etal.: Bone mineral measurements of subchondraland trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporoticrabbits. Skeletal Radiol 2006; 35:34-41
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Wang X, Mabrey JD, Agrawal CM: An interspeciescomparison of bone fracture properties.Biomed Mater Eng 1998; 8, 1: 1-9.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
Mazzo CR, Reis AC, Shimano AC, ValenteML: In vitro analysis of the influence of surfacetreatment of dental implants on primarystability. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26, 4: 313-317.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JG, JansenJA: Influence of surgical technique and surfaceroughness on the primary stability of animplant in artificial bone with different corticalthickness: a laboratory study. Clin OralImplants Res 2010; 21, 2: 213-220.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
Shalabi MM, Wolke JGC, Jansen JA. The effectsof implant surface roughness and surgicaltechnique on implant fixation in an in vitromodel. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006; 17: 172-178.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
Dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti LimaJH: The effects of superficial roughness anddesign on the primary stability of dental implants.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13,3: 215-223.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
Kim SJ, Kim MR, Rim JS, Chung SM, ShinSW: Comparison of implant stability after differentimplant surface treatments in dog bone.J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18, 4: 415-420.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
Roberts RW, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, MozsaryPG. Smith R: Osseous adaption to continuousloading of rigid endosseous implants. Am JOrthod 1984; 86: 95-111.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA,Lindstom JA: Osseointegrated titanium implants:Requirementsfor ensuring a long-lasting,direct bone to im-plant anchorage inman. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52: 155-170.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U: Early failuresin 4,641 consecutively placed Branemarkdental implants: a study from stage 1 surgeryto the connection of completed prostheses. IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6, 2: 142-146.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH: Biomechanicaland histomorphometric study of dental implantswith different surface characteristics.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87, 2: 303-311.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
Koh JW, Yang JH, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH:Biomechanical evaluation of dental implantswith different surfaces: Removal torque andresonance frequency analysis in rabbits. J AdvProsthodont 2009; 1, 2: 107-112.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
Rastelli C, Fallsi G, Gatto R, Galli M, SacconeM, Severino M, Di Paolo C: Implant stabilityin different techniques of surgical sites preparation:an in vitro study. Oral Implantol(Rome) 2014; 27, 7, 2: 33-39.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
Blihan H, Cilingir A, Bural C, Bilmenoglu C,Sakar O, Geckili O: The evaluation of the reliabilityof Periotest for implant stability measurements:an in vitro study. J Oral Implantol2015; 41, 4: 90-95.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
Choi HH, Chung CH, Kim SG, Son MK:Reliability of 2 implant stability measuringmethods in assessment of various periimplantbone loss: an in vitro study with Periotest andOsstell Mentor. Implant Dent 2014; 23, 1: 51-56.
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks dziedzin
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2391-601X
ISSN:0033-1783
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top